onderwijs, human technology, maatschappij
23 +1
Today the Interactive Media Products semester started off with twenty-four students, 23 male and 1 female. When I worked as teamleader of the Human Technology programme in The Hague I once went to a meeting, somewhere in an industrial area in Maarssen, that was organized by an organization that strived for more women in science and engineering. What I learned was that basically everybody wants more women in science and engineering but nobody knows how, and the girls just don’t want it. The problem already starts in high-school in the third grade, when girls (and boys) have to choose a ‘profile’. Many girls do not choose the “Nature and Technology” profile. Some choose “Nature and Health”, but most do not choose Nature at all. If they choose Nature and Health they think of choosing a career in health-care, mayby studying medicin, or speech pathology, or perhaps even biology. But not engineering. Girls are not attracted to anything that starts with Technology in the header. (Lot’s of boys aren’t either - absolutely speaking there are not many people studying in the exact sciences anyway). Why is this so?
It is inborn.
It is conditioned right from the cradle.
It is both.
I don’t really know. What I do know is that the girls that *do* want to study technology *don’t* wish to be associated with girly topics. So all the attempts to make technology courses that appeal more to the ‘human’ side of things - as if that would then attract more women, don’t seem to work. Either you want to be in health-care, or you want to be a programmer, but being a girl that likes programming doesn’t predict you being particularly interested in programming social websites for independent living seniors in an e-care project.
Or do the women readers of this weblog, that also happen to be in a science / engineering department, think differently?
I would still like to attract more women to the course. But how to do it? I already cut out the word technology in the header. Interactive. Media. Products. What should I do next?
Popularity: 20% [?]
30 Aug 2010 admin
I think you should go to France. There are much more women in technical studies over there. That was one of the good things of studying over there
Human Technology Den Haag dit jaar:
11 dames, 28 heren
Put an advertisment in the ‘Tina’, or maybe make it an extra (experience bonus points) goal for the ‘Voorlichtings Tool’ projectgroup.
In Rusland schijnt ingenieur zijn echt een vrouwenvak te zijn. Geen haar op het hoofd van echte Russische mannen zal technicus worden. Wat ze dan wel worden, dat weet ik niet. Verpleger?
One of the problems might also be that only MEN want to say something about this topic. What do female readers think???
Men should think about womens issues.
het is nog te ‘catchy’: Interactive Media Products, dat is alsof je iets voor de toekomst bouwt, vaag, niet concreet. Ik hoorde van de opleiding PFT (process&food Technology) die graag meer vrouwen wilden aantrekken dat ze een campagne deden met als uitgangspunt: Het concrete resultaat. Ze hadden posters met duidelijk een product, wat aanzet tot een levensverbetering (iets met wortels ofzo) en een grote stand wat eigenlijk supermarktschappen waren waarin je het uiteindelijke product dus ziet. Conclusie: vrouwen houden van concreet resultaat, en ook goede argumenten: dus leg uit waarom het ‘nodig’ of ‘belangrijk’ is dat dit project gedaan wordt, en niet alleen maar geek-achtig toffe dingen maken (er zijn overigens enkele vrouwen die daar wel van houden, daarvan heb je er nu waarschijnlijk 1)
Concreet. Hm. Eh… “Kom onze minor doen en ontwerp een afstandsbediening voor je Dyson”?
Ha nee dat klinkt dan ineens weer enorm vrouwonvriendelijk, het was meer een linkje naar mijn andere post waar Janneke ook al op zat te reageren. … Sorry…